Electric shock collars for pets to be banned

Dog with shock collar Symbol copyright Getty Pictures

Electrical surprise collars for cats and canines will be banned in England, the government has announced.

The coaching gadgets deliver as much as 6,000 volts of electricity or spray noxious chemical compounds to regulate animals’ behaviour.

Environment secretary Michael Gove mentioned this causes unacceptable “hurt and suffering”.

Wales and Scotland have already taken steps to prevent the use of electrical collars.

Animal charities, lots of which had campaigned for the modification within the law, welcomed the move.

Symbol Copyright @DavidBowles21 @DavidBowles21 Symbol copyright Getty Images Symbol caption There Is “no excuse or want” for surprise collars, the RSPCA said

A ban at the gadgets used to be sponsored by SEVENTY FOUR% of individuals in a 2014 poll by the Kennel Club.

The canine welfare agency stated a ban could make sure that pets were trained with “positive strategies, loose from pain”.

The announcement follows a central authority consultation, during which half of the 7,000 responses mentioned they did not wish to see containment fences banned.

Image Copyright @TheKennelClubUK @TheKennelClubUK


Twitter post by @TheKennelClubUK: BREAKING NEWS!We ’re thrilled to announce that the Government are banning the use of electric shock collars across the UK.It ’s been a hard-fought campaign for us, starting over 10 years ago; but today ’s news will ensure dogs are trained using positive methods, free from pain. Image Copyright @TheKennelClubUK @TheKennelClubUK


Mr Gove stated: “We Are a nation of animal fanatics and the use of punitive surprise collars cause harm and struggling to our pets.”

He advised pet house owners to make use of “certain reward coaching strategies” instead.

Ian Gregory, a lobbyist for pet collar producers, campaigned to forestall the ban on containment fences, arguing that they helped prevent some of the 300,000 deaths of cats in street accidents.

He mentioned that animal charities exaggerated the affect of the shock added by way of a collar, which was about a millijoule of power, in comparison to cattle fencing which used to be 1000 times extra powerful.

“The anecdotal problems pronounced with puppy collars can also be resolved via product standards rather than by means of banning a confirmed generation,” he said.

“the masses of thousands of dog homeowners using far off running shoes don’t need to be criminalised.”

, , , ,