“Everybody may just see what he used to be doing,” she wrote. “that’s the most disgusting thing. Everyone knew what Harvey was up to and no one did anything.
“It Is improbable that he’s been capable of act like this for many years and nonetheless keep his occupation. That’s only possible as a result of he has a huge quantity of energy.”
Weinstein has denied any non-consensual sexual contact with any women.
But allegations of incorrect behaviour were common knowledge among a few who worked for him, in line with the new York Instances.
When the paper broke the tale, it mentioned that dozens of his former and current staff, from assistants to top executives, “said they knew of irrelevant habits while they worked for him”.
“It wasn’t a mystery to the interior circle,” Kathy DeClesis, a former assistant to Weinstein’s brother and business partner Bob, informed the paper.
One of the typical themes of the money owed that experience emerged is that Weinstein staff could arrange conferences with young women and regularly accompany them to hotel rooms ahead of disappearing and leaving the ladies and the manufacturer on my own.
Image copyright Getty Images Symbol caption Harvey Weinstein at the crimson carpet in 2012
The The Big Apple Times related how a tender feminine employee hand over after complaining of being forced to organize what she believed to be assignations for him. She stated she could not comment as a result of she had signed a non-disclosure agreement.
Many folks have prompt such staff may have long past public. But Weinstein was once one in every of essentially the most robust males in Hollywood and his domineering persona – except any sexual harassment – used to be legendary.
In a memo quoted by means of the paper, any other former employee, Lauren O’Connor, described the experiences of girls at the company, including herself. She wrote: “The steadiness of power is me: 0, Harvey Weinstein: 10.”
What about those in Hollywood and The Big Apple beyond Weinstein’s personal firms? Tales of his sexual advances spread amongst actors, marketers and others in the movie industry.
Symbol copyright PA Symbol caption Alison Owen didn’t understand her own sister-in-law were preyed upon
Many celebrities who have commented in recent days have mentioned they did not recognise what used to be going on, although they knew he had a sleazy reputation.
Oscar-nominated actress Annette Bening instructed BBC Radio 4’s Front Row she knew he used to be “boorish” – but wasn’t aware of what went on behind closed doors.
British manufacturer Alison Owen, who has worked on movies like Saving Mr Banks and Suffragette, told BBC News his behaviour was once “an open mystery”.
“Everyone had heard the stories approximately Harvey,” she said. “in the event you have been in the film business, there was no means you could now not have heard the ones stories approximately Harvey.
“I by no means heard a story from the horse’s mouth. But there were always tales approximately, ‘Oh an actress advised me’, or ‘Someone operating at Harvey’s corporate instructed me’, or ‘Did you listen about that intern who labored for Harvey?’
“So That They have been all the time 2d-hand however they have been many and multifarious.”
Harvey Weinstein: The accusers’ tales Oscars academy to hold talks on Weinstein Matt Damon denies ‘killing’ 2004 tale
Such used to be the extent of chatter that Owen said she wouldn’t let younger ladies meet Weinstein alone. individuals who were preyed upon had nowhere to turn, she says.
“if you were an actress and Harvey had groped your breasts while you had been alleged to be auditioning for him, what are you going to do?
“you’re not going to move to the police. They’re unlikely to take that seriously. you’re not going to call a journalist as a result of at that time Harvey had the entire media global in his pocket and no-one used to be going to head up against Harvey Weinstein.
“there has been just a downside to reporting it… Harvey’s going to ruin your career.”
Image copyright Getty Pictures Symbol caption Weinstein along with his estranged wife Georgina Chapman in 2015
Owen’s sister-in-law Laura Madden labored for Weinstein – but by no means advised Owen approximately his overtures in opposition to her. The producer most effective found out approximately them while she learn the new York Times.
“Such is the energy of shame, i feel,” Owen instructed BBC Radio 4’s PM. “That’s one more reason people do not pop out.”
The revelations have surfaced now, Owen believes, as a result of “the present tradition has modified”.
“The winds have shifted to the other direction and other folks have now been ready to go on report.”
But is not going to the media have said the allegations earlier than?
A string of newshounds have stated in recent days that they attempted. however the problems of persuading his accusers to go at the document, coupled with the drive of Weinstein’s legal threats, meant none were able to submit.
Image copyright Getty Photographs
Sharon Waxman, a former Ny Instances reporter who went on to arrange film website online The Wrap, told BBC Newsnight how she chased the tale in 2004 and tracked down a woman who had reached a payment with Weinstein.
“I did manage to meet with the woman who had taken a payoff in London, however she actually wouldn’t say the rest,” Waxman said.
“She if truth be told just met with me and did not discuss. a very frustrating dialog. She was once terrified that she was violating her non-disclosure.”
in the event that they desired to publish, media outlets had to be sure that their stories have been watertight in case Weinstein sued.
“Any bad story that was once going to be printed approximately him, he might pass complete-on aggressive,” Waxman recalled.
“Any card he may play, any software he may just use to get that tale to not seem in print… i was informed that he had visited the newsroom for my part to speak to my superiors. i do not realize what he stated. i don’t know what threats were issued.”
Accusers ‘backed out’
Others tried to pursue Weinstein too. The Hollywood Reporter editor-at-huge Kim Masters and The Big Apple Instances media columnist David Carr came with regards to finalising stories – but their sources backed out at the last minute, The The Big Apple Instances mentioned.
Vanity Fair special correspondent Gabriel Sherman, who helped discover sexual harassment by way of overdue Fox News boss Roger Ailes, stated one the most important piece of evidence in the new York Instances tale was once the inner memo by which Lauren O’Connor raised concerns against Weinstein.
“That piece of printed subject matter was one in all the foundations of the new York Instances document,” he advised BBC Radio 4’s Media Show.
Rebecca Traister wrote on New York magazine’s The Minimize website online that she first heard the allegations in 2000 – but that Weinstein “may spin – or suppress – anything”.
She persevered: “for decades, the reporters who tried to inform the story of Harvey Weinstein butted up in opposition to the similar wall of sheer force and immovable energy that was once leveraged against those formidable actors, the inclined assistants, the executives whose careers, salaries, and reputations were in his hands.”
So for years, individuals who did understand may just best talk in whispers or, like Seth MacFarlane, below the guise of jokes that have been funny simplest because they rang real.
Observe us on Facebook, on Twitter @BBCNewsEnts, or on Instagram at bbcnewsents. in case you have a story recommendation e mail entertainment.news@bbc.co.uk.