Symbol copyright Reuters Symbol caption Mr Spicer visited wax figures of Mr Trump and the first Lady at Madame Tussauds in Ny final April
Ex-Trump spokesman Sean Spicer has described his former boss as “a unicorn, using a unicorn over a rainbow” in his forthcoming memoir.
The first spokesman of the Trump White House writes glowingly of the president but additionally contradicts his review of former campaign chairman Paul Manafort.
“I Don’t suppose we will ever again see a candidate like Donald Trump,” he says.
The Briefing: Politics, The Click and the President is because of be released 24 July and has been praised by way of Mr Trump.
“His high-twine act is person who few could ever practice,” Mr Spicer writes, in step with preview excerpts bought by the Guardian.
Symbol copyright EPA
The e book contradicts Mr Spicer’s earlier feedback about Mr Manafort, who resigned in August 2016 amid allegations he had now not declared bills originating in former Soviet countries where he had worked as a political lobbyist.
Mr Manafort was once jailed last month and is charged with money laundering, tax fraud, failing to register as a foreign agent, and obstruction of justice.
Mr Spicer had said all the way through a White House press convention that Mr Manafort “performed an excessively restricted function for a very restricted quantity of time”, echoing Mr Trump’s claim that his former marketing campaign chairman had only been with the campaign “for a brief period of time”.
Sparks fly in FBI agent’s Trump testimony Manafort: Trump’s former campaign chair
“Paul brought a far-wanted maturity to the Trump marketing campaign,” Mr Spicer says, adding that prior to he joined “there was no semblance of a campaign construction, only a few, distraught, overworked other people repeatedly barking into their telephones.”
“Paul instantly set up and staffed the political and communications operations necessary to tackle the Clinton system.”
Mr Spicer additionally writes that the us Department of Place Of Birth Security met with the campaign in October 2016 to guarantee them “that there has been no strategy to infiltrate or manage the end result of a national election”, in step with the Day-To-Day Mail.
However, US intelligence has concluded that Russian hackers centered Democratic electronic mail servers, and dedicated other cyber-attacks in an effort to aid Mr Trump’s campaign.
“Seeming to consider that Clinton may win, they implored us to publicly categorical confidence within the integrity of the vote casting process, device, and end result,” writes Mr Spicer.
