Grenfell: What Is took place to money promised for fireplace survivors?

grenfell memorial Symbol copyright Getty Images

A 12 months on from the Grenfell Tower fire crisis, survivors are marking per week of remembrance – away from the “politics” – for the SEVENTY TWO people who misplaced their lives.

BBC Reality Check has obtained figures appearing the dimensions of the restoration attempt, and what is nonetheless to be performed to start out to assist the community again onto its toes.

In February, on the Brit Awards, London-born grime artist Stormzy used his live performance after choosing up two awards to invite the top minister: “Theresa Might, where’s the money for Grenfell?”

On The time, the federal government stated it had pledged £58.9m, of which £30m had been spent.

But the Ministry for Housing, Groups And Local Executive (MHCLG) was unable to say what it were spent on – even though it spoke back to a Freedom of data request made by means of Fact Check saying the “majority of the money” have been spent by way of the council.

What has been spent in total?

The £256.7m spent thus far has been used for:

obtaining and renovating social housing, and other similar prices (£145.4m) social care (£25.9m) emergency accommodation for survivors (£25.6m) securing and dealing with the location of the fireplace (£19m) brief and permanent accommodation for survivors (£THIRTEEN.5m) toughen products and services for survivors and the wider community, together with offering welfare centres and neighborhood-based totally beef up (£THIRTEEN.2m) compensating leaseholders for lack of assets (£10.1m) corporate services – principally prices in the case of aiding the general public inquiry and the coroner (£4m) Symbol copyright Getty Photographs Image caption All The Way Through his performance on the Brit Awards, filth artist Stormzy requested Theresa Might what had took place to the money for survivors

The council has devoted over £235m to secure 307 homes, such a lot but not all of which has now been spent.

And it has also promised to cover costs in terms of the future use of the Grenfell Tower website, which “has but to be decided through the neighborhood”.

Meanwhile, in addition to the £10m for psychological health fortify products and services that was once given to the council by the Treasury, NHS England spent about £4m closing financial 12 months and is ready to spend £6m this monetary 12 months, during the native NHS Accept As True With, for psychological well being products and services for survivors.

what is the £78m from the federal government for?

rehousing survivors (£24m) refurbishing the Lancaster West Estate, which the tower used to be a part of (£15m) handling the Grenfell Tower web site (£12m) mental health fortify – now not together with separate money for NHS products and services – (£10m) make stronger for the quick reaction, for example emergency repairs (£7.3m) funeral prices and cash bills to survivors (£6m) welfare centres (£3m)

What about cash donated by the general public?

in addition to the money pledged by means of the government and raised through the council, £28m was raised in charitable donations, of which £24m has now been distributed.

And TWO HUNDRED tonnes of bodily charitable donations were additionally made, of which FORTY ONE tonnes of recent or nearly new pieces were disbursed some of the neighborhood suffering from the fire.

the rest was both sold in British Purple Go shops for Grenfell or became cash thru recycling, raising an extra £226,000 for survivors.

What approximately cladding?

in addition because the £80m the government has promised to spend on the survivors and the local area, £78m of which is to move during the council, the government has additionally committed to spend £400m on doing away with doubtlessly unhealthy cladding from council and housing affiliation owned tower blocks round England.

This cash will initially come from an present pot of money intended to fund the Reasonably Priced Homes Programme.

Symbol copyright Getty Pictures

In Would Possibly, it was showed there have been 323 such homes taller than 18m (60ft) in England that had unsafe cladding on them – together with residential blocks and publicly owned homes akin to schools and hospitals.

of these, 311 have been judged to be a fire danger and not going to fulfill current building laws.

Work has began to eliminate the cladding from 107 of these however to this point has been completed in exactly 10.

Where are the survivors?

a complete of SEVENTY TWO other folks died as a result of the blaze, the judge-led inquiry has mentioned. This comprises Maria Del Pilar Burton, SEVENTY FOUR, who died in January. She had been in hospital due to the fact that she was once rescued from the nineteenth floor.

The survivors, who lived in 138 of the residences within the tower and the adjoining Grenfell Stroll, have now break up into 203 households – 116 from the tower and 22 from the walk.

some of the unique families dwelling within the tower contained a couple of generations, for example grandparents and grown-up kids, who’re now being given the opportunity to have properties of their own.

The council mentioned it had dedicated to securing 307 properties to offer the 203 households with a call of properties.

As of 13 June, in keeping with the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea:

the council has made a complete of 971 offers of a few kind of accommodation to the 203 families 198 of the 203 have now usual an offer of a house 135 of these have moved in – 52 into an temporary home, EIGHTY THREE into a everlasting home SIXTY EIGHT households from Grenfell Tower and Walk are still living in emergency lodging – of those, FORTY TWO are in lodges, 22 are in serviced apartments and 4 are staying with circle of relatives or friends NINETY households from the encompassing estate – but no longer the tower or Grenfell Walk – are also nonetheless living in emergency or brief accommodation, prior to moving again to their original houses

Read more from Fact Test

Send us your questions

Follow us on Twitter

, , , ,

Leave a Reply